For credentialing verification organizations
Faster files. Same source rigor. Receipts your reviewers will stand behind.
VitalCV models every issuer response as a receipt candidate, not a verification — so a clinician moves only when a human reviewer accepts the policy decision.
What changes for you
Receipt candidates, not silent approvals
Issuer responses become typed receipt candidates with explicit limitation notes. Nothing is decision-grade until a reviewer accepts it under your policy.
PSV reuse with explicit consent boundaries
Cross-tenant reuse is blocked unless a consent receipt is on file. Constraint tampering is detected at the database level, not just the UI.
Drop-in next to your existing CVO stack
API-first, schema-typed, audit-ready. We sit alongside your existing case management; we do not require ripping out a system of record.
How VitalCV fits your flow
- 01
Issuer request goes out
Clinician consent + partner route are recorded. The request itself is not a verification.
- 02
Issuer responds
Response is normalized into a receipt candidate with attribution, source basis, and limitation notes.
- 03
Your reviewer makes the policy call
Five-gate policy review. Only an accept_candidate decision under ready_for_policy_review can produce a PSV receipt candidate.
See it on a real file.
Ten-minute screen-share, no slide deck. Bring a closed file you would not mind us walking through end to end.